Driving privileges for the patients with uncontrolled diabetics
Driving privileges for the patients with uncontrolled diabetes
Deontologists focus on the rightness or wrongness of action as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of an outcome (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016). Therefore, a deontologist cannot celebrate the consequence without analyzing the action that brought up the action. In other words, a bad action can bring out a good outcome, and also a good action cannot result in a bad consequence. Deontological ethics contrast the consequential ethics, which emphasizes the outcome of an action rather than the morality of the action. As such, they disregard the process and only concentrate on the results. In other words, the end justifies the means. Therefore, in analyzing this argument, using the deontological approach, actions will take priority over their associated consequences. The morality of the actions will be thoroughly examined, while the morality of their related outcomes will be disregarded.
Unlike the consequentialists, deontologists emphasize the process. As such, in this case, the actions of controlling the driving privileges of people with diabetes and also reporting their cases to the department of motor vehicle (DMV), require a thorough analysis. First, the act of controlling the driving privileges of the diabetic people is discriminatory. Discrimination is morally wrong, regardless of how or …
Free Deontology argument on the statement provided in the order instructions Essay Sample, Download Now
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicGet an original paper on the same topic
from $10 per-page