Associated Press. “Court Ruling on Offensive Trademarks Boosts Washington’s ‘Redskins’ Stand.” The Guardian, Guardian News and Media, 19 June 2017, www.theguardian.com/sport/2017/jun/19/washington-redskins-name-supreme-court-ruling-nfl.
The Associated Press (1) reports a development in the Supreme Court case regarding the banning of offensive trademarks. The court ruled in favor of the Slants; a musical band that was contesting the government’s decision to refuse their application for a trademark patent. The data in this piece is accurate and informative. The Associated Press (1) shows the link between the Slants and the Washington Redskins and describes how the ruling affects both parties. The piece will help me prove the inaccuracy of the argument that the name is offensive to Native Americans. The decision discussed in the article will enable me to argue my case from a legal standpoint.
Ford, Dan. “The Washington Redskins Shouldn’t Change Their Name.” The Breeze, Blox Content Management System, 13 Sept. 2017, www.breezejmu.org/opinion/the-washington-redskins-shouldn-t-change-their-name/article_10eb0036-97e3-11e7-9be2-1b6f9782d0b8.html.
Ford (1) argues that the Washington Redskins should retain their name because the facts prove that Native Americans are not offended by the name. He also provides examples of other teams with a connection to these Native Americans that use the same name. The argument pr…
Free The debate on whether the Wahington Rediskins name is offensive to Native americans Essay Sample, Download Now
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicGet an original paper on the same topic
from $10 per-page