The most crucial distinction in neoanalytic writers is in their nature, on whether they are objective positive thinkers or constructive thinkers, termed as relativistic thinkers. Freud was known to be an objective positive thinker, with his emphasis and interest on the promotion of psychoanalysis. The interest in psychoanalysis was without a doubt a natural science that had operations on actual and real material in the discovery of the laws of nature (Horacio, 2018). Therefore, objective thinkers who are the analysts remained tasked in being scientists with the objective of having an interpretation of the client material. The analysts are therefore the actual sources of right and wrong for the client material (Brown, 2018).
The descendants of Freud further end up viewing the nature of things and truth in them as being inseparable in reality, depending on the observer as the judge. They stipulate that an individual’s fact is not similar to another person’s truth, therein some aspects of difference in opinions. They suggest that the real relationship differs in its construction, where the client and the counselor take part. The development of the relationship between the two players brings about the notion of two-person psychology, ideal in emphasizing the role that both the client and counselor undertake. It is evident that there lacks an observer in the constructive thinkers as the one present in the objective…
Free Neoanalytic writers Essay Sample, Download Now
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicGet an original paper on the same topic
from $10 per-page