CAP # 9 feedback

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Number
Date
CAP # 9 Feedback
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points Both the title page and the PICO questions are provided.
10 Points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a clearly stated clinical relevance statement which seeks to assess which pitching strategy is associated with high ball speeds and an increase in joint loading. The paper has a clear and concise clinical bottom line that relates the knowledge learned from the article with occupational therapy.
20 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides comprehensive information regarding all the procedures of the research, findings, discussion, and conclusion.
The paper is a comprehensive review of the article since it captures the significant details and information from the article.
30 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial …