CAP # 5 Feedback

Critically Appraised Paper Peer Rubric (CAP)
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points Both the title and the PICO question have been clearly stated.
10 points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a relevant clinical statement which evaluates the impact of group-based behavioral exercise programs to reduce and prevent urinary incontinence.
The paper has a clearly stated clinical bottom line.
20 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides comprehensive information regarding how the intervention led to improved physical performance among older women. The paper explains how an occupational therapist can apply the knowledge to help old women improve their physical performance.
30 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial statement of study strengths and limitations for both or one article incompl…