CAP 8 feedback

CAP # 8 Feedback
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points The paper has a clearly stated PICO question in a separate title page.
10 Points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a clear clinical relevance statement which surveys the influence of equine assisted on children with ASD. The paper links the clinical relevance statement with occupational therapy to offer insight on how this intervention can help children with ASD.
20 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides wide-ranging information to support the study. Each section of the paper showcases the importance of the research.
The paper does well in reviewing the information reported in the article but some information is missing and some if misleading.
25 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial statement of study strengths and limit…