CAP # 3 feedback

Grading and Comments
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Critically Appraised Paper Peer Rubric (CAP) – 100 points
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points The critical question is provided. Running head is not numbered. There is an unnecessary spacing in the title (Pico Question)
8 Points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a relevant clinical bottom line which emphasizes the effectiveness of sensory-based interventions while treating children with behavioral difficulties. The clinical relevance statement is clearly stated in the paper
20 Points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided in an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The study covered vestibular, tactile and proprioceptive interventions of SBIs. The paper provides sufficient information regarding how occupational therapists can use SBIs to address behavioral disorders and improve functional performance.
28 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
…